www.filmbrats.com

hotline
reviews
shorts
interviews
home

Please select a letter from the list below to see the reviews.

a / b / c / d / e / f / g / h / i / j / k / l / m / n / o / p / q / r / s / t / u / v / w / x / y / z


Behind The Screens

by Jon Waterman
Volume 1, Issue 2
Volume 1, Issue 1
Special Features
D-VHS
Digital Projectction vs. 35mm
Multiple DVD Releases

FILMBRATS - REVIEWS

The Waiting Room (*)
review by Jon Waterman

Ahmet is an extremely popular director who has won critical acclaim and a large fan base. He’s currently working on a film adaptation on Dostoyevsky’s “Crime and Punishment.” The script is probably ready, but the project seems to be missing something. Ahmet is in deadlock with himself and is on the verge of tossing the production completely, when he comes across a young man trying to rob his house. He lets him go, but later thinks that this could be the answer to his long, sulking nights. Now, in order to save the film and his mind, Ahmet must search the city to find this criminal (and convince him to act).

Writer/director Zeki Demirkubuz also plays Ahmet. Perhaps this was one too many tasks for him to take on this time around. The film just doesn’t do it for me. For one, I hated the main character. He’s a total jerk to everyone he comes in contact with. He’s completely self-serving and I don’t know how any audience member could possibly sympathize with him. Perhaps this is Zeki’s idea of a general commentary about filmmakers. Even so, that doesn’t make it any more entertaining or interesting. Because we don’t even want to like the guy we’re going to spend the length of the picture with, we don’t care about the film as a whole.

The movie is called “The Waiting Room” for a reason. You’ll be waiting for something to happen. For a long long time. There are many time consuming shots, which I would contend were included to get the film up to a normal feature length of 94 minutes. I can understand that it’s supposed to convey loneliness and despair and all that great, melodramatic stuff. But here’s the thing: It’s boring! Maybe if the cinematography was a little more interesting or even properly conveyed the thoughtfulness of Ahmet, it would be better. As it stands, there are a couple of unique shots and some slightly appealing lighting choices that get overshadowed (forgive the pun) by the tiresome wait. The last shot of the movie was so excruciatingly painful to watch, simply because it was obvious that it would be the closer, yet it refused to cut to black.

It’s supposed to be about making a movie, but it’s more about us making sense of Ahmet. That much I can respect. The rest, not so much. I’m trying to figure out the significance of “Crime and Punishment.” Having not read it doesn’t help. So far, I think it’s meant to convey the audience’s feelings by the time they walk out of the theater. This one drained me. Don’t wait around. Move on.

respond to jon@filmbrats.com