3:10
to Yuma (1957) (***1/2)
review by Jon
Waterman
Dan Evans is a poor farmer struggling to keep his family afloat
when he loses two cattle in the midst of a stagecoach robbery.
Notorious criminal Ben Wade was the leader of the operation.
Well, when Wade celebrates in the nearest town a little too
long, he gets captured. Since Wade was caught in a town with
very little law enforcement, the robbed banker offers a much
needed $200 to anyone able to assist in transporting the villain
to prison. Evans accepts the challenge to help repay for the
lost cattle and then some. Now it’s off to Contention
City so he can get Wade on the 3:10 train to Yuma and his new
jail cell home. Hopefully, Wade’s gang won’t be
waiting.
The first thing you’ll notice is how beautifully shot
the film is. Right from the start, the picture showcases sprawling
old west scenery throughout the dynamic cinematography and
creative framing of Charles Lawton Jr. The cameras placed on
the carriages - looking down at the horses as they run through
the dusty landscapes - add to the immediate excitement before
the heart of the story even has a chance to grab you. And it
will.
Based on a story by Elmore Leonard, you’ll find this
movie packs a big wallop without much action. The movie is
more a battle of wills and wits rather than an all-out gun
slinging shoot ‘em up. That doesn’t mean it’s
any less tense. In fact, it’s probably more so because
the characterization is so strong and the situations are so
easily relatable. Not the whole escorting a prisoner to a train
while avoiding his deadly gang thing, but rather the situations
posed in Wade’s manipulative attempts to be set free.
You’ll often find yourself asking what you would do in
that situation. Of course the great acting helps. Van Helfin
as Evans shows a drastic character arc while continuously keeping
his performance low-key and contemplative. Ben Wade could have
been more evil, but I guess that’s the price you pay
for having Glenn Ford play him. Still, the charm he exudes
makes him even more dangerous - even if he isn’t sinister.
Honestly, the only real weak point is the music. I found it
to be a tiny bit over the top and overabundant. It’s
okay to take a break from scoring every once in a while. The
dialogue is extremely strong and doesn’t always need
the music trying to hone in and take over the scene. I also
thought the title song was relatively poor. But, it’s
easy to look (or listen) past the music to find an intelligent,
gripping film with an incredibly thrilling climax. Who needs
tons of gunplay? All you need is a taut story like this that’s
equally thrilling.
respond to jon@filmbrats.com
|