300 (***)
review by Jon
Waterman
Greece, 480 BC. Xerxes, King of Persia is on a quest for world
domination. He’s already collected the skulls of several
kings that resisted him and made slaves of their women and
children. He comes to Sparta with plans to expand his empire
and earn more trophies. His army numbers in the hundred thousands.
Sparta has a good sized army full of men trained to be soldiers
since birth. The problem is that the council will not allow
the army to fight Xerxes, because the oracle foreshadows failure.
Sparta’s King Leonidas is not one to back down. In fact,
that goes against every fiber of his warrior being. He will
fight to keep his country free, because cowardice is worse
than death. Leonidas heads to the battlefield with 300 men
poised to take down the Persian army one by one thousand.
If anything can be considered a modern epic, this is it. Here
we have a grossly inaccurate (on purpose) historical battle
beefed up with technology and gadgets. I’m not talking
about on the field itself; they aren’t shooting laser
beams and driving mech suits (although now that I’ve
said that a script for a direct to video release is already
in the works). No, I’m talking about how the film incorporates
computers and digital editing software to achieve its effect.
Now, the real question becomes is this a good thing? Do these
machines make a better film, or should they be relegated to
simply spell-checking (they don’t like the word Leonidas)?
The answer is yes…and no. On the plus side, the computers
allow for enhanced color correction, making for the perfect
amber shaded palette of the battlegrounds that provide the
perfect backdrop for a massacre. Computers can give us blood
like we’ve never seen before. Sure the CGI looks fake,
but it still adds a great effect as the digital red goo spurts,
shoots and splatters out of the mowed down Persian masses.
By not relying on squibs and other traditional techniques for
blood, the fight sequences can go longer, and this is the most
important aspect in my mind.
The action, and there is plenty of it, generally is played
out right in front of your eyes. There’s a little bit
of that typical MTV seizure-fast editing. But for the most
part, the fight sequences are crystal clear. One particular
shot is nice and long as the digital editing zooms in on each
of the slow-motion slices and stabs. It’s a nice shot,
but I couldn’t help but be reminded of “Oldboy” which
does a similar thing a whole lot better (in real time, longer,
and without the zooming).
The downside of creating an epic featuring a cast of thousands
in front of a bluescreen is that those thousands are all fake
(as are the animals, which I’m half okay with). You never
see all that many people on the screen at one time. It felt
more like “30” than “300.” I would
have preferred to see thousands of extras all lined up in costume
a la “Spartacus” rather than a bunch of tiny colored
blobs randomly swaying around in the distance. Fake people
just aren’t impressive.
But nothing really wowed me about this picture. It was certainly
fun despite the so-so acting and the better suited for comic
book storyline (I can’t believe it took three people
to basically transcribe Frank Miller’s graphic novel).
The rock music could have been much more intrusive and cheesy
than it ended up being, but I still didn’t really like
it being in there at all. If you’re looking for a mindless
action flick, this will certainly fit the bill, because the
bountiful and visually appealing fight scenes are the only
really worthwhile aspect of the film.
respond to jon@filmbrats.com
|