28 Weeks
Later (***1/2)
review by Jon
Waterman
After taking its toll on countless lives, it appears as though
the Rage virus has finally subsided and has been all but eliminated.
London is beginning the reconstruction process. All the survivors
are being brought back as more housing is available within
the limited contained sector. The entire time they are under
the constant surveillance of the United States Army, which
has been assigned there to ward off any potential outbreaks.
Everything is going according to plan until one day an infected
survivor is found. The woman is the first found where the disease
lies dormant in her system. She has no bloodlust, but she can
pass on the disease. Someone like her may lead to the cure.
I bet you can’t guess what happens next.
The film opens in nearly the best way possible. It starts
when the infected are still alive and very much kicking (or
biting…mostly biting). Don (Robert Carlyle, “Trainspotting”)
and Alice (Cathering McCormick, “Spy Game”) are
a married couple hiding out in a shack with a few other survivors,
when inevitably the flesh-craving mob storms the house starting
a great chain of events that shows Don barely getting away,
while leaving his wife for dead. We’re thrown right into
the action, it’s intense, the plot is furthered along
without bogging everything else down, there’s plenty
of blood and gore and freaky moments, and the music comes in
perfectly to accentuate it all.
In fact, the music does that a lot. John Murphy’s score
is masterfully composed and mixed so that it can unobtrusively
build in the background until its time to pump it full force
and overpower the scene. You’ll find there are several
times throughout the picture where the music makes the scene.
That’s because you’ll definitely be able to guess
what happens next. While the script, written by four people – including
director Juan Carlos Fresnadillo (“Intacto”), is
above average, it is extremely predictable. So, any level of
suspense has to come from other means. John Murphy provides
the perfect outlet.
All told, the film is a whole lot of fun. My only major complaint
is with the cinematography (by Enrique Chediak). Where “28
Days Later…” seemed to use digital video for a
specific purpose, this effort apparently uses it just because
the first film did. Also, the movie is built more for the small
screen. There’s an abundance of close-ups, most of the
time, without purpose. The handheld camerawork coupled with
seizure-inducing rapid editing in the action scenes makes it
nearly impossible to really tell what’s going on, especially
in the otherwise rock solid opening. We shouldn’t have
to rely solely on the audio to make sense of the visuals. It’s
truly a shame, because I think I saw some good blood and gore
mixed in there.
Lucky for us, there’s still plenty of it that we are
able to see. A couple of the scares actually work, and the
movie is effectively creepy through and through. This movie
is just pure fun and adrenaline. If it weren’t for the
predictability and the piss-poor shooting style, this would
be far and away one of those rare sequels that outshine its
predecessor. As it stands, it’s just barely more enjoyable
than the original, but still making it well worth the price
of admission.
respond to jon@filmbrats.com
|