www.filmbrats.com

hotline
reviews
shorts
interviews
home

Please select a letter from the list below to see the reviews.

a / b / c / d / e / f / g / h / i / j / k / l / m / n / o / p / q / r / s / t / u / v / w / x / y / z


Behind The Screens

by Jon Waterman
Volume 1, Issue 2
Volume 1, Issue 1
Special Features
D-VHS
Digital Projectction vs. 35mm
Multiple DVD Releases

FILMBRATS - REVIEWS

2046 (***)
review by Jon Waterman

Mr. Chow is back. After the events of “In the Mood For Love” left him embittered, he began a life of decadence and womanizing. His days consist of writing articles for various magazines and creating all kinds of pulp fiction. His nights consist of making each new girl he meets his latest conquest. Enter Bai Ling, his neighbor across the hall. She is the most difficult challenge he’s encountered so far, but Mr. Chow is determined to break her. Both of them cautious and aware yet seem oblivious to what they really might mean to each other.

Even though it’s a sequel, it’s a pretty far departure from the first film. The cinematography still has some of the cryptic compositions, but this time it’s much more vibrant and, in my opinion, lively. It focuses more on the characters. However the set pieces look incredible and allow you to become fully immersed in the story much easier. That’s definitely a good thing, because the movie’s tempo doesn’t play through any faster and the running time has extended about thirty minutes over “In the Mood.” The story isn’t more linear, but it’s less of a dotted line structure. The acting is still really good this time around, too. But what really sets it apart is the secondary thread.

The film has part of one of Chow’s stories built into it. It’s about a futuristic train that takes people to and from a mysterious place where you can recapture your lost memories. His alter ego is the only one to ever return from that place, and he tries to relate to the female robots he encounters on the ride. This scenario essentially bookends the movie. I would have loved to see it weaved within the normal narrative more frequently. I also would have liked it better if it didn’t force feed everything to you. There’s no room to figure out anything on your own (not like it would be very hard to anyway), because the narrative beats it into your head several times. Maybe adding some of his other stories into the mix would have helped too. Place him in the detective or samurai settings and draw those parallels as well.

So, although the movie is an improvement, it’s hardly spectacular or awe-inspiring cinema. If you can handle the length and aren’t expecting an overly deep movie (the symbolism is obvious and overdone), you should have a good time. This is beautiful filmmaking that doesn’t quite have the support of the narrative.

respond to jon@filmbrats.com