13 (Tzameti) (**)
review by Jon
Waterman
Sebastian is a young handyman trying to make a living by fixing
up the roof of a seemingly wealthy man’s house. He needs
the money to help provide for his parents and siblings who
are barely scraping by. When the home owner suddenly dies,
he’s left with no one to pay him for the work he’s
done so far. What he does have, however, is a letter addressed
to the owner. After overhearing a conversation, he believes
the contents of this secret envelope are the key to earning
a very large sum of money. Sebastian blindly follows the directions
given to him and suddenly finds himself in an inescapable underworld
where gambling is the game and human beings are the playing
pieces.
The concept is strong and the game itself has great potential
to be incredibly intense, but the film never really hooked
me the way I thought it would. Various crime bosses get together
to make some desperate soul compete in their sick game. Each
man is given a gun. They stand around in a circle and point
the gun at the back of the head of the person in front of them.
They all look up at a light. Once that light goes on, the game
goes on. The first time around, the suspense is chilling. The
referee shouts the rules while looking equally nervous and
authoritarian. Bodies hit the floor and you’re thinking
this could get pretty good. Then after seeing the same thing
happen a few times, the predictability increases and you slide
to the back of your seat.
I wish they would have switched it up a little bit and thought
of a few different life-threatening games for them to play.
Russian roulette would be the first round in a series of nail-biting
contests. I also wish the set-up was different. It would have
been nice to have followed a couple people to the scene of
the games. It also would have been nice to get to them a little
faster. Granted, if you don’t know what the movie is
about, it would be a greater shock once you see what Sebastian’s
gotten himself into. However, most people will have been drawn
in by the concept of the gruesome game and don’t want
to sit through a slow-moving first act that unfortunately does
nothing to build up the suspense or mystery of what’s
to come later down the line.
So, the movie could have been more effective (as could the
cinematography), but it’s still not bad to watch. It’s
highly possible that I’ve just become jaded and desensitized
towards violence like this in the movies. But more likely,
I think it’s that I could easily see the path the film
was taking. The acting is pretty solid, but that doesn’t
make up for the sparse story. Give it shot if you want, but
the odds are it won’t hit.
respond to jon@filmbrats.com
|