|
Film
as Counterpoint: The Quandary of Inherent Violence
A Review/Ponderance of Straw Dogs: Criterion Collection by Mike Meyer
I never saw a Sam Peckinpah film before Straw Dogs. All I knew was that
his films were more or less a punch line in film history jokes, having
raised the bar for gore and violence in films with his ultra-violent western
The Wild Bunch. I bought the DVD sight unseen simply because I had a gift
certificate and eager to learn more about the man Sam Peckinpah with the
Disc 2 documentaries/interviews than the actual film. But the film was
as jaw dropping as it was eye opening. My whole face was tired after running
through both DVDs within a few short hours.
The film itself is a cautionary tale that explores viewpoints and subject
matter usually written off in this day and age. A meek mathematics professor
David Sumner (Dustin Hoffman) settles in with his visibly sexual wife
Amy (Susan George) settle in a small Cornish village. Over the course
of the film, it’s established that the professor tries to avoid
conflict in every situation. Amy even illustrates that this failure to
face conflict is the reason he’s retreated to the village in the
first place. Meanwhile, the local village lads take a liking to Mrs. Sumner
and begin to pitch woo like the only way they know how…like beasts.
Less of a romantic woo, these men do what they can to debase and weaken
both the professor and his wife to the point of helplessness, viewing
Amy’s sexual abstinence towards them as almost a fight-like physical
defensive formed by high society which they have to combat with a matching
fight-like offensive, more like akin to conquering an enemy than a mate.
As not to spoil the main crux of the film, the constant battle of the
Polite Abstinence vs. Violent Release rages on to illustrate very graphically
the absolute horrors of absolute abstinence, how it breeds the more violent
release, and how a balance must be struck between the two.
What’s absolutely astounding about this film is that it takes the
ideals of it’s era (late 60s, early 70s) and turns them on it’s
ear, stating that using an across-the-board peace policy prevents real
issues from being faced and ultimately breeds more violence, at least
in terms of the human being. This idealism is way ahead of its time (or
classic idealism, depending on how you look at it) in terms of acknowledging
this practical need of the human to experience anger, violence, and most
of all healthy necessary confrontation. True to form, the film itself
proves it’s point by confronting the audience outright. According
to Peckinpah himself, Straw Dogs wasn’t designed for audience empathy.
Just the opposite. You were supposed to cringe in horror when David snaps
and exacts unwarranted violence on innocent villagers in what the audience
knows is the defense of a murderer. He wanted you to experience as vividly
as possible that there is nothing glamorous about true violence but confrontation
needs to be explored or else more violence is bred. The film accepts the
need for confrontation and even the male predilection for violence, sexually
and otherwise, as an unavoidable entity, something to be dealt with rather
than suppressed. Straw Dogs is also one of the most biting satires I’ve
seen. Pekinpah absolutely refuses to wink at the audience to give them
a “heads up, we’re being ironic” like even the greatest
film satirists of the age can be accused of doing (read: Kubrick).
If the film weren’t enough (or if you just didn’t get it and
are appalled), Disc 2 is as enlightening about the film and its father
and just fascinating. At the top of the list, the documentary Sam Peckinpah:
Man of Iron gives people a look into not only into the mind of a crazed
genius but one that helps explain why he made what he made and how we
can use his life and work as a way to help understand the modern day Peckinpah’s
like Oliver Stone, people who are committed to bringing the ugly truth
for the sincere purpose of make the audience say “That WAS ugly!”
breeding much more than entertainment, but grimly effective argument through
counterpoint.
respond to mike@filmbrats.com |