Spider-Man
3 (*1/2)
review by Jon
Waterman
Spider-Man has reached the status of icon. His image is everywhere
around the city and can be seen on all sorts of merchandise.
That’s a little tough for Peter Parker’s/Spidey’s
girlfriend, Mary Jane, to handle. You see, she just finally
got her break in a Broadway show and then got panned for horrible
performance (see below). Peter’s friend Harry wants to
take revenge on Spider-Man for killing his father. Eddie Brock
wants to take Peter’s photography job at the Daily Bugle.
Then there’s this guy who turns into a sand monster and
starts terrorizing the city. And to top it all off, some black
goo comes down from space and blackens Spider-Man’s suit
and heart.
After setting the bar so high by releasing two moderately
good films, this newest entrant was almost doomed to fail.
But even with my lowered expectations it still managed to disappoint.
Let’s discuss, shall we? For starters look at that very
brief plot synopsis I wrote above. There is just way too much
going on here. The series hasn’t had the best track record
(with me) for being able to balance Peter’s personal
life story with his private superhero life story. Now they
want to throw this potential engagement and love pentagon story
(Peter, Mary Jane, Harry, Eddie, Eddie’s girlfriend Gwen)
at us while stuffing three villains down our throats in completely
unsatisfying portions.
They could have easily devoted an entire movie to each of
the three bad guys. Deal with the personal stuff while tackling
Harry as the new Green Goblin out for revenge. Give Sandman
and his resilient re-constructible powerful form a whole story.
And definitely devote an entire picture to the black symbiotic
slime turned evil doppelganger that is Venom. Hell after that
story is done give Venom his own movie without Spider-Man.
The reason you do that is because as it stands the villains
are just spread out too thin and I felt cheated, especially
in the case of Venom.
Nothing seemed to really work in this film. It’s like
Sam Raimi forgot what makes a good action movie. Why would
you ever bookend a summer blockbuster like this with musical
numbers? Why would you have our hero talk it out with a bad
guy? There’s nothing I love more than to see a pow-wow
session to solve their problems. Why would you have a long
dance scene in the middle? Why did you think Emo Spider-Man
would be a good idea at all? Where was the consistency?
The film seemed like each individual scene was trying to be
its own little movie. Too many of them carried a tone separate
from the surrounding scenes. It was all over the map and failed
to be the cute or funny or heartwarming or thrilling or intense
or sing-songy or romantic or whatever scene it was trying to
be at that moment. Bruce Campbell’s scene was good, but
not for a Spider-Man movie. The only thing that had any sort
of uniformity was the aerial action scenes. You simply cannot
tell what in the world is going on in these. You see a blurry
red suit flying past a bunch of crazy angled blurred buildings
along with some villain. You basically have to rely on the
soundtrack to clue you in when something was thrown or when
someone gets hit, because it simply moves too fast. The action
isn’t very exciting to begin with. I think it’s
because all the other elements of the picture pull you out
of it, that the fight scenes have to really work to win you
back.
I really don’t know how I was able to keep my attention
focused on the screen for the entire too-long 140 minute running
time. Maybe it’s because eventually I gave up and started
laughing at it. I mean there are only so many locket and ring
shots a guy can take before giving up. You’d think a
director like Raimi wouldn’t insult our intelligence
like this. Everything was phoned-in. The actors were worse
than usual (and I sincerely hope Dunst never works again),
as was the dreadful dialogue in the script. I felt like the
movie was just a big F-You to the audience. They knew it was
going to make money so why bother making it good. If a fourth
one gets made, I’ll tell you, there’s only room
to go up. But after all this bashing, I have to say that somehow “X-Men
3” is still worse.
respond to jon@filmbrats.com
|