Sky Captain
and the World of Tomorrow (*1/2)
review by Jon
Waterman
When giant flying robots land in the streets of New York City
and start wreaking havoc, only one man can stop them. Joe “Sky
Captain” Sullivan rushes in to stop the immediate threat
and get the metallic behemoths to retreat. However, there’s
a larger threat out there. The man sending these evil creations
has been killing off the world’s top scientists and the
destruction of the Earth could be imminent. The Cap’n
will need the help of a sassy reporter he knows all to well
named Polly Perkins if he’s to have any chance at all.
The film is meant to pay homage to the movies of the late
1930s, especially those “Buck Rogers” type serials.
Writer/director Kerry Conran does a good job with this in certain
areas, but ignores many others in favor of flashiness. The
movie is shot entirely in front of a blue screen, which means
that all the background action and scenery was added after
the actors were finished and a composite of the elements
was made later. What I imagine it was meant to do was show
what
a film from 1939 would look like if back then they had the
same computer graphics capabilities, but film technology remained
where it was. This may not have been the goal, but it should
have been.
First: the good. Every shot in the film is given a blur/soft
focus effect on the brighter light and there’s a heavier
presence of grain on the image. Also, the actors appear to
have been colorized in a Technicolor-like process. All of this
would fit the limitations and stylistic look of the represented
era. The robots and machinery seen all over give that “Popular
Mechanics” impression. The giant robots are big, bulky
and look ridiculous, but menacing. There are also more advanced
planes that the villain sends that look sleeker, yet still
are within the limits of that period’s notion of science
fiction. Edward Shearmur’s music was appropriately heroic
and uplifting. It could have played along with the action some
so as not to lose it in the background behind all the sound
effects. So, the props, the film look, the music and the scenery
all work, but….
Now: the bad. The film falls victim to thinking that it must
still be contemporary. The acting is bad, but not God-awful.
The biggest problem is that it’s not worse. It’s
not stagy. People were still mostly exaggerated and flamboyant.
Jude Law (The Cap), Gwyneth Paltrow (Polly) and the rest should
know this and would probably enjoy delivering lines in the
old style. I can only assume it was Conran’s conscious
decision. The script is also bad, but could have been purposely
worse, meaning hokier. Avoid developmental issues and let the
characters blurt out seemingly random emotionally charged sentences
to further the plot. Most of the backstory was unnecessary
to me. The editing was also far too modern. This can actually
be paired with shot composition, which I also had problems
with. In the beginning, they made good use of low and canted
angled shots and of dissolves to get information across. As
the story became more linear, it became more of an action movie.
The cutting was MTV fast and there were many places where the
sound effects told you something was happening, but you sure
can’t tell it from the picture. If this were true to
1930s cinema, the camera would let the action play out from
a relatively safe distance so we could soak it all in. We’d
be able to properly admire the spectacle of it all. That’s
far from the case here.
The movie makes all kinds of references to various movies
to show its “influences,” but one in particular
bothered me. That was the appearance of Godzilla in a quick
montage sequence. I know they both involve giant destructive
monsters, but shouldn’t the “King
Kong” similarities
suffice? Leave the cheap joke alone. I also don’t think
I like seeing Laurence Olivier being used as an actor in here
one bit. All in all, the movie could have been much better
were it to stay true to the time period in which it was set.
It’s stylized, but not in a good or productive way. So
much so, that it becomes just an odd-looking, hardly entertaining,
typical action flick. Very disappointing.
respond to jon@filmbrats.com
|