www.filmbrats.com

hotline
reviews
shorts
interviews
home

Please select a letter from the list below to see the reviews.

a / b / c / d / e / f / g / h / i / j / k / l / m / n / o / p / q / r / s / t / u / v / w / x / y / z


Behind The Screens

by Jon Waterman
Volume 1, Issue 2
Volume 1, Issue 1
Special Features
D-VHS
Digital Projectction vs. 35mm
Multiple DVD Releases

FILMBRATS - REVIEWS

Signs (**1/2)
review by Jon Waterman

On a small town farm, some crop circles have appeared. The local officials are chalking it up to the hooligan kids playing pranks. After all, everyone knows it’s a hoax, right? Reverend Hess tries to calm his young kids down when more circles appear not only in their cornfields, but also simultaneously around the world. Are the local boys in on some sort of worldwide sham, or could something else be going on?

Writer/director M. Night Shyamalan must be running out of ideas. If he really wanted to make a movie about crop circles, he’s about twenty-five years too late. There’s a reason we don’t hear about them anymore. Everyone knows how they are done and it’s not fun anymore. But he’s not really making a movie about crop circles. It’s about the reactions to them and all of that stuff. It’s just a lame cover story for the emotional core. I also didn’t like that he created this hype and hysteria within the film. Why mess with the twist in the plot? Just put it all out in the open, and let the characters deal with that and it would have been just as effective without some of the disappointment. The problem is he thinks he has to put a surprise in each movie to stay consistent with himself. If he really wants to grow as a writer (and maybe he doesn’t), then he should start exploring different avenues and storytelling methods.

The similarities between this film and “Night of the Living Dead” are pretty apparent, but I think “NLD” does a better job handling the paranoia and the changes in personality. There’s more media coverage here, but I don’t know how much it actually fuels the audience. It certainly is the main argument behind the characters’ moves. What it does do is allow us to see that this is in fact not an isolated incident while allowing us to stay isolated with the family.

There are a lot of issues of faith here. The dad used to be a Reverend in this religious community. All the recent events have taken a toll on the entire family. The two kids are obsessed with learning about what’s going on. By the way, the kids don’t act normal. They have this creepy “Children of the Corn” thing going on. I guess that’s what the farm life does to some people. It’s interesting to see the emotional breakdowns that go on and the irrationality that can stem from what could be an innocent event. Even though I’ve criticized the storytelling, there is a worthwhile emotional storyline here that doesn’t deserve to be clouded in the supernatural fluff.

M. Night could be a great director. He has a reasonable command over the visual aspect and he works well with the actors to get what he wants from them. He just needs to break away from this fake twist ending stuff. He needs to stop hiding behind this standard he’s set for himself, put everything out in the open right away and let it all develop naturally from there. That way you can avoid disappointment and have a more solid movie. This won’t blow anyone away, so don’t expect a surprise of any kind and you may be able to enjoy it more.

respond to jon@filmbrats.com