The Signal (***)
review by Jon
Waterman
Mya is married to Lewis, an exterminator that just isn’t
that great of a husband. Mya is sleeping with Ben, the guy
she wishes her husband would be. Ben wants her to leave Lewis
and their hometown of Terminus behind to start a new life together.
Mya’s not quite sure she can pick up and leave just like
that, so she goes back home to her husband. But, as if a love
triangle wasn’t complex enough, they all also have to
contend with a mysterious force that’s penetrating the
airwaves. Television, radio, cell phones and other tech devices
are emitting strange noises and, when applicable, showing unusual
images. This may sound like a mere annoyance, but it’s
driving everyone mad. People are going blood-thirsty-ravenous-killer
crazy because of it. People like Mya’s husband. It looks
like Mya’s going to try to make her escape, if she can
get out of town alive.
I went into the film knowing virtually nothing about it, so
I was pretty worried when the first sequence I saw on screen
was this horrible handheld digital video horror movie. Luckily
the campy slasher-in-the-woods flick is bad on purpose and
was just something that’s on TV when the signal starts
to interrupt. Although, once I got into the actual movie it
wasn’t that great either to start. You have the basic
movie plot material and very mundane script. The acting is
one step away from being good – instead it’s just
okay. Then, once the horror element kicked in (you don’t
have to wait too long), it began to win me over.
In fact, it’s that continual progression and mutation
of the story and presentation that makes this movie so fun.
The hokey love story quickly morphs into a paranoid thriller
which runs face first into homicidal killing spree, and it
just goes from there. Three directors took on the three segments
you’ll see (David Bruckner, Dan Bush and Jacob Gentry – they
also wrote and edited their corresponding parts). Each treats
a different character from the love triangle as the main character.
There’s some overlap in the timeline, but overall the
story continues to move along towards the unusual, but good
resolution. I don’t know if they really had to divide
the film in three parts like that, and they certainly didn’t
need to use flashbacks. We’re smart. We can figure out
that we’re now following someone else from a few minutes
ago, especially when you get to a part that happened already.
But what you sacrifice in editing and technique, you gain in
good craziness.
Around the second act, the film diverts from its animalistic
murderous scares to a more subdued form of affliction (they
call it “The Crazy”) that allows for some pretty
funny moments. You may think that going from essentially straight
horror to something of a spoof would be off-putting, but it’s
really not. It means the movie is now more unpredictable, the
cast of characters is expanded, and the violence actually gets
more graphic. The three sections flow together nicely. It would
be nicer if they didn’t divide it up in that way, but
hey.
After the rough start, I really came to enjoy this movie.
The three filmmakers never go for the cheap scare. There’s
a very cool makeshift mace made out of knives and duct tape.
Some of the later dialogue is witty and fun (and there’s
a great movie moment where they “jump start” a
decapitated head so it can give them advice). I also appreciate
that it’s never explained what causes the troublemaking
noise and static. There are a couple of BS theories that are
meant to be BS and, to me, for this movie, that works perfectly.
I would have liked to see better overall direction and cinematography,
but the film is still a hell of a lot of fun to watch.
respond to jon@filmbrats.com
|