www.filmbrats.com

hotline
reviews
shorts
interviews
home

Please select a letter from the list below to see the reviews.

a / b / c / d / e / f / g / h / i / j / k / l / m / n / o / p / q / r / s / t / u / v / w / x / y / z


Behind The Screens

by Jon Waterman
Volume 1, Issue 2
Volume 1, Issue 1
Special Features
D-VHS
Digital Projectction vs. 35mm
Multiple DVD Releases

FILMBRATS - REVIEWS

The Ring (2002) (***1/2)
review by Jon Waterman

Alright, I have to write this quick, because apparently I only have seven days to live. “Why?” you may ask. Well, because I’ve seen “The Ring.” Legend has it that after watching the tape, you become cursed – doomed if you will. In exactly seven days, you will die. Following the odd, untimely death of her niece, newspaper reporter Rachel Keller decides to put the rumor to the test. This of course includes watching the evil movie. Now she has just one week to fit all the pieces of the puzzle together and hopefully stop whatever it is that happens from happening.

Director Gore Verbinski takes his shot at remaking the Japanese film, “Ringu.” Along with his cinematographer Bojan Bazelli, he creates a genuinely spooky world that is terrifyingly fun to explore. The locations have the deep shadows necessary for such a suspenseful feel, yet they still manage to be quite vibrant and lively and at the same time, otherworldly. The tape in question is given its own personality. Aside from looking like an utterly pretentious student film, the harsh contrast and grain lend it its eerie tone.

Writer Ehren Kruger (“Scream 3” and “Arlington Road”) does a wonderful job of taking the original work and fleshing it out into something more interesting and more cohesive. Instead of being largely psychic or intuition based, the characters actually need to use the tape to find clues. There is a legitimate mystery behind this guise of a horror film. Everything comes together full circle in the end, too (pardon the pun). The symbolism had the potential to be weak and corny, but actually it’s handled very well and the visual links work beautifully as well.

The acting is a little off and forced yet still far above other horror films. The biggest offender is David Dorfman, who plays Rachel’s son. You can’t expect Haley Joel Osment “The Sixth Sense” quality out of every kid, but he was a little stiff, and could have been slightly more off-putting (in a good way). It didn’t seem like any of the actors really gave it their all (not even Naomi Watts in the lead). However, at no point did the lines seem forced or overdone – and that’s rare in this type of film.

Strangely enough, this American remake is much better than the slightly annoying, humdrum Japanese original. I hesitate to use the word “scary,” but it’s definitely effective and severely creepy. It lacks the cheap thrills and jumps, which makes it a more satisfying overall experience. This film is the best argument against being a couch potato and watching movies. With that said, grab some popcorn and your blankie and see “The Ring.”

respond to jon@filmbrats.com