|
The
Real Cancun
(*)
review by Jon Waterman
Do you love all of that reality TV that’s taking over the airwaves?
Do you wish someone would transfer the magic to the big screen? Well,
today is your lucky day! Thanks to the creative hands of Bunim & Murray
(the tag team that brought you all those wonderful reality shows on MTV),
we now have “reality film.” It’s revolutionary. I believe
they call it a documentary. Don’t quote me on that, though. Being
that this bunch is the first to do it, they can’t do any wrong,
but I’ll still dissect this new art form to see what it’s
all about.
The concept behind the movie is that sixteen college kids have been handpicked
to live in a house down in Cancun during Spring Break. The cameras will
then follow their adventures and the audience gets to learn about what
this week long vacation actually entails. Being the smart people they
are, the casting director found a nice representation of the population.
A cross hash. A cornucopia. Let’s see…there’s the partier…the
partier…the twin partiers…the partier…skip a few…and
the clean cut kid who’s never tasted alcohol before in his life.
Just like real life! The real Cancun has nothing else to offer.
From here on out, I’m going to call this movie “Chicks and
Beer: The Motion Picture.” It’s a huge advertisement from
“The Board of Alcohol is the Best Thing Ever.” No “real”
negative repercussions were shown involving it. If you drink, you will
have fun and you will be much, much more attractive to the opposite sex.
And if you don’t drink, then you are a pansy and you will be a loser
for the rest of your life. So, knowing this, the non-drinker starts drinking
and I’ll be damned if his life didn’t improve drastically.
Suddenly, there are women all around and money to the ceiling (from all
the future booze endorsements he’ll do).
Obviously, he was the star of the piece. They focused on him so much so,
that a few of the sixteen were practically completely cut out. You never
really heard them speak. Too many people were in that house. If they can
fill a whole season of television with only seven people, what made them
think that 90 minutes should be filled with more than twice as many people?
Speaking of the house, did we really need to see an aerial shot of it
before every scene that takes place there?
Is there any good in this thing? Sure. It’s hilarious. Not completely
on purpose, but it is. There are some sequences that were edited together
well and would have brought about some emotion if I actually cared about
anyone. However, I couldn’t for the life of me remember what they
are, because that’s how memorable this film is. Blech! Special appearance
by Snoop Dogg.
respond to jon@filmbrats.com |