www.filmbrats.com

hotline
reviews
shorts
interviews
home

Please select a letter from the list below to see the reviews.

a / b / c / d / e / f / g / h / i / j / k / l / m / n / o / p / q / r / s / t / u / v / w / x / y / z


Behind The Screens

by Jon Waterman
Volume 1, Issue 2
Volume 1, Issue 1
Special Features
D-VHS
Digital Projectction vs. 35mm
Multiple DVD Releases

FILMBRATS - REVIEWS

Ray (****)
review by Jon Waterman

Ray Charles Robinson went blind at the age of seven. That didn’t stop him from living as complete a life as possible. His mother taught him to do things on his own and to not let a lack of sight hinder his vision and his aspirations. Ray took that to heart and headed up to Seattle to start his career as a professional jazz pianist. His skills were apparent from the beginning, and he quickly got bigger and bigger deals. He dropped the Robinson from his name and embarked on a recording career that would continue for over four decades.

His life sounds pretty good summed up like that, doesn’t it? We all know that Ray Charles is a legendary, talented musician. What we may not know is what the movie focuses on. This is the first biopic to come out in a long time that avoids sugar coating any aspect of the subject’s life. At no point did I envy him. It seemed less like a celebration of his life and more of an exorcism. All of his demons are exposed and wrenched out on the screen. I gotta hand it to first time writer James L. White. He managed to make the movie interesting for a potentially painful one hundred fifty two minutes. I could have gone longer, actually. The film covers the most tumultuous years and then very very briefly glances over the rest in the span of five minutes. Some of the dialogue was quite clichéd, but the performances helped greatly to diffuse that.

Virtually all of the characters in the film had some level of depth. Often times it was minimal based solely on the amount of screen time they received, but the wide array of dynamic personalities made for a much richer environment. Sharon Warren (as Ray’s mother) stood out to me. She had to exude a complex range of emotions, and there’s no question that she pulled it off. Even Bokeem Woodbine (as band mate Fathead Newman), who had previously shown me nothing that proves he belongs in the business, impressed me with his character’s subtle progression. Of course, the stand out is Ray, I mean, Jamie Foxx. Foxx is just a dead ringer physically. The movements, the smile, the posture and poise are all pitch perfect. The acting is fantastic, too. A very far cry from “Bait.” It’s amazing that the two biggest hams from “In Living Color” have turned out to be such revered actors. This is definitely one of the best performances of the year.

Director Taylor Hackford and Cinematographer Pawel Edelman put the whole thing together in a visually dark, yet appealing manner. I’d like to thank Taylor for sparing us from any blind or near blind point-of-view shots. I also appreciate the use of red/orange flashes in between shots. It turned out to be a good effect that wasn’t beaten to death. I wish the movie had forced us to pay more attention to the details of the surroundings like Ray had to. As it was, I felt a little distanced and unable to connect fully with anything besides the music.

Despite a deep connection with Ray, it is an incredibly emotional, moving film. The feelings are perfectly punctuated by the music. It was a wise decision to not have Foxx sing these classic songs. These are sung in a way that only Ray’s distinctive voice could sing them. The whole film was handled nicely and couldn’t be executed much better. This definitely beats “The Aviator.”

respond to jon@filmbrats.com