The Producers
(1967) (***1/2)
review by Jon
Waterman
Producer Max Bialystock is in a rut. He used to be the über-producer
on Broadway, churning out hit after hit. Now he’s fallen
on hard times and has to scrape the bottom of the fundraising
barrel to put together any type of play. Existence is looking
pretty low until accountant Leo Bloom enters to balance the
books from Max’s last flop. Leo finds out that Max raised
more money than he used to create the play, and is just told
to hide it. It’s then that Leo theorizes that one could
make more money from a flop than with a hit, by doing the same
thing on a larger scale. The two go into business together
and set out to make the worst play the theater community has
ever seen.
Established TV writer, Mel Brooks, makes his feature-length
directorial and writing debut in this brilliant and occasionally
funny film. The whole film screams of a vaudevillian influence.
Actually, the whole movie screams. There are countless moments
where a joke is delivered at the top of the characters’ lungs.
I guess the louder it is, the funnier it is (and that rule
of thumb works most of the time here). But back to the vaudeville
thing; the twist comes in that neither of the two leads in
the mismatched duo plays the straight man. Zero Mostel (as
Max) plays the boisterous manipulative loudmouth that can’t
possibly be used effectively as a set-up guy. That is unless
there’s a continual back and forth between him and the
sweet, shy, yet overly neurotic Leo (played by Gene Wilder).
The story line bounces around from one crazy scene to the next
bringing us some predictable jokes while introducing us to
a cast of wacky, unpredictable characters. Brooks gets some
nice satirical jabs in there, as well as some good laughs,
but most of the best humor is more clever or subtle.
It’s hard to imagine that such an escalating crazy adventure
could be considered subtle, but it is. A lot of that has to
do with the incredible comedic performances given by Mostel
and Wilder. Both are talented actors who perfectly assume the
identities of their characters. Mostel plays the sleaze ball
wonderfully while still allowing the audience to feel this
odd pity for him right from the start and then makes us question
if that’s just part of his game. Wilder has already completely
mastered the art of facial expressions and subdued body language
for comedic effect without looking like a cartoon. The other
actors provide the more animated aspects. The two-dimensional
supporting cast probably could have been more over-the-top,
but that wouldn’t have been as enjoyable. It’s
good that it seems like in some strange way they held back.
The film isn’t amazingly funny, but it’s beautifully
crafted. Brooks’ direction and collaboration with cinematographer
Joseph F. Coffey provides us with some surprisingly beautiful
shots that you normally wouldn’t see in a comedic film.
The most noticeable of this can be found with Max takes Leo
out on the town to convince him to go along with the scheme.
It’s just another example of how such an up front movie
can have some great subtle aspects that make it truly entertaining.
respond to jon@filmbrats.com
|