Pale
Eyes (*1/2)
review by Jon
Waterman
Here we have the story of Fanny, a woman forced to live with
her brother and sister-in-law due to her mental illness. Fanny
doesn’t get along with her sister-in-law to begin with,
and things get worse when she catches her cheating on her brother.
The resulting confrontation at home makes Fanny so furious
she picks up and leaves, taking her brother’s car. She
finds herself looking for her father’s grave, someplace
she’s never been allowed to visit before. Along the way
she comes across a backwoods cabin where she just may be appreciated.
This movie has a lot of problems with disclosure that really
hurt the audience’s ability to understand why everything
is happening. For instance, we know Fanny is mentally ill,
but only because they tell us so. They never say what she’s
suffering from besides a brief mention of hearing voices (which
doesn’t seem to be enough). Just from watching her on
the screen, she simply seems like a fully capable adult who
just also happens to be an overly dramatic person who has been
sheltered. There’s a lot of missing back story that would
help us out a lot. You wait a long time to get anything from
the characters and you don’t get much for your trouble.
The ending is also quite cryptic, but that’s more understandable.
What’s not so acceptable is the severe tonal shifts
within the film. It happens when she goes out alone in the
car, and again once she meets the cabin owner Oskar. And the
film moves unbearably slow, so any change like this is impossible
to hide. The movie isn’t emotionally draining like it
probably should be, it’s physically draining. I would
say a good fifteen minutes or more could be cut from the already
short 87 to make this a more effective story. I just don’t
understand the motivation of the editing. They don’t
seem to realize how to end a scene properly. It either lingers
on too long or gets cut off before running its course. They
include this overly long piano montage of her driving (including
too many point of view shots out the windshield) which concludes
with her pulling in someplace. The next cut right after is
her driving aimlessly again. What happened?
There are a few different directions the film could have gone.
I could easily see this being a pretty creepy/scary story with
the mentally handicapped jealous sister angle. Maybe that direction
would have been better than the silent love story. I appreciate
the concept, but I saw “Cast Away” and I don’t
think I need another movie half covered in silence, especially
one that doesn’t work nearly as well. I think Tom Hanks
talked more to his volleyball than Fanny talks to the foreign
language speaking Oskar. Well, I’m going to take a cue
from this movie and just stop talking…now.
respond to jon@filmbrats.com
|