www.filmbrats.com

hotline
reviews
shorts
interviews
home

Please select a letter from the list below to see the reviews.

a / b / c / d / e / f / g / h / i / j / k / l / m / n / o / p / q / r / s / t / u / v / w / x / y / z


Behind The Screens

by Jon Waterman
Volume 1, Issue 2
Volume 1, Issue 1
Special Features
D-VHS
Digital Projectction vs. 35mm
Multiple DVD Releases

FILMBRATS - REVIEWS

Match Point (***)
review by Jon Waterman

Tennis instructor and former professional player Chris Wilton is trying to find meaning in his life. After a meeting with a wealthy student Tom brings him in contact with Nola, he just may have found it. The only problem is that Nola is Tom’s fiancée. He knows that the best way to stay in touch with her is to wed Tom’s sister Chloe, and so he does. Unfortunately, that only complicates matters, because now not only does he have an insatiable desire for someone other than his wife, but he also has to deal with married life and the high level job Chloe’s father arranged for him. He can’t fix this problem simply by hitting the ball to the other side and hoping they mess up.

This is the un-Woodiest Allen like movie I’ve seen. Granted I haven’t seen all too many, but it seems to break a lot of what seems to be his conventions. The most noticeable is that it’s not shot in New York, but that’s hardly the most important. I do think that to an American audience, the unfamiliarity of the London setting adds more tension in the moments that need it. The most prominent change is the lead character. There’s no hint of the nervous, unconfident man who fumbles his word with awkward social graces. Jonathon Rhys-Meyers (“Bend It Like Beckham,” “Velvet Goldmine”) plays Chris 180 degrees away from the Allen typical lead. That’s not to say he doesn’t have his neuroses. After all what would a fascinating character be without flaws, but I’ll let you watch the movie to discover those.

The directing style also seems to have changed. I found this to be more like what your typical drama/thriller might look like. All the close-ups, cutaways and insert shots made it anti-Allen. That’s not to say it’s bad. In fact, I found it refreshing to see that he is capable of breaking free of the conventions he seemed to have set for himself. Then again, I could be wrong and maybe he’s done that before. He probably has. Either way, it was shot rather conventionally and if anything needed improving, I would recommend that be given more flair or originality.

That’s really a minor point overall, because it’s still a very effective movie. It may not be Woody Allen’s best work and certainly not his most groundbreaking. But paired with “Melinda and Melinda” he’s shown this year that he still knows how to make good films under a wide reaching umbrella. “Match Point” probably doesn’t deserve any major awards, but it certainly deserves a look by Allen fans and newcomers alike.

respond to jon@filmbrats.com