Marie
Antoinette (2006) (1/2
star)
review by Jon
Waterman
Marie-Antoinette is an Austrian teenager sent to France to
be married to Louis XVI. The marriage is meant to help bridge
the gap politically between the two countries. However, for
the arranged marriage to truly be a success, it must be taken
seriously. It must be believed by the general public that there
is love in the forced relationship. There must be a child.
Who would have thought consummating a marriage would be so
difficult?
Yeah, there’s more to the story, but not really all
that much more. Going in, I didn’t know exactly what
to expect, but I certainly wasn’t looking for a period
piece version of “American Pie” where the lead
character spends the majority of the picture trying to get
laid. I know it isn’t meant to be a strictly historically
accurate biopic, but come on. Maybe if there was some depth
or characterization here all could be forgiven, but alas. Here’s
the extent of the characterization: he doesn’t want sex;
she does. Oh, and she’s a party girl.
The acting certainly doesn’t help matters either. Once
again, we’re subjected to one of the worst mainstream
actresses working today – Kirsten Dunst. Her delivery
is drier than the casts’ powdered wigs. There is absolutely
no inflection in her voice whatsoever. I’m very glad
there was so little dialogue early on, even if it did kill
the pace. The rest of the cast is almost just as horrendous.
Anyone could have played these parts. They way they are presented
on this screen takes absolutely no skill whatsoever to pull
off and it’s frustrating.
The only thing the movie really has going for it is in the
visuals. The set pieces, costumes and locations look fantastic.
I do find fault that absolutely everything is lit. Not only
is there no depth in the acting, but there’s also none
to be found in the cinematography. There are some great looking
shots and I love the look the muted pastel color palate accomplishes,
but the visual side only pleases aesthetically, not emotionally.
Writer/director Sofia Coppola takes a huge misstep with this
film. I really don’t care how true to life the story
is. It’s not the job of the movies to be a history book.
It’s the job of the movies to be entertaining. This one
tries hard, but fails. Coppola wants the film to have indie
street cred so badly. She injects modern indie instrumental
pieces to go along with the classical works of music. Then
the music just gets progressively worse, culminating in the
extravagance montage set to “I Want Candy.” And
like I mentioned before, the pacing is way off. In the beginning,
she spends so much time on certain sequences that it becomes
painful. Yes, we get it, the marriage is awkward, move on from
the ring already. Then after the first act or so, it’s
all slapped together haphazardly. The film becomes disjointed,
especially since there appears to be no consistency in the
emotional content between two consecutive scenes. So, as a
result, the film isn’t a historical take on the life
of Marie-Antoinette, and it really isn’t a thematic take
either. It’s just a pathetic movie that doesn’t
deserve your time.
respond to jon@filmbrats.com
|