Lone
Star (1952) (*1/2)
review by Jon
Waterman
The United States is looking to turn the Republic of Texas
into a state. However, Texans aren’t too keen on that
idea. Joining the US would mean denying the proposed treaty
with Mexico and thus starting a war with them. After going
through the heartbreak of the Alamo, the Republic doesn’t
quite want to go through that turmoil again when it’s
just as easy to remain separate. President Andrew Jackson doesn’t
want to give up hope. He knows if Sam Houston agrees, Texas
will be behind them. So, Jackson sends Devereaux Burke to find
him.
This is one of the most politically charged westerns I’ve
seen so far (granted, that isn’t too many). It presents
the arguments for and against annexation in a nice back and
forth format. However, the arguments against seem much more
thought out than those for it. I guess there’s really
no reason to restate the case if you’ve already won.
The audience knows how it turns out, so why prove it was worth
it, right? Either way, it was still a way to flesh out the
story line and differentiate it a little from the other westerns.
If you’re not too political or don’t care about
all of that stuff, you might enjoy all the fighting. There
are a few shootouts and a brawl or two to pump the adrenaline
up and balance out the “boring” stuff. Horses,
guns, arrows, fisticuffs, battering rams, explosions, stuff
breaking – what more could you want? Anything to draw
attention away from the ridiculous love story is just fine
with me. I don’t know if was just the lacking chemistry
between Clark Gable (Burke) and Ava Gardner (pro-Texas newspaper
editor Martha Ronda), or if not enough quality time was devoted
to it before it really got popping, but something just didn’t
sit quite right with me. It was a strange, roundabout way to
further the plot.
The whole process took longer than it should. They describe
what will happen, show it happening, and then tell other characters
what happened. It’s a bit too repetitious for my taste.
And also knowing how it all turns out adds to the drag factor.
I think the action sequences were the only scenes that really
made the movie worth watching, ultimately. Those weren’t
incredibly spectacular either, but at least they were well
done and proved entertaining.
I know there are better westerns out there, there are better
love stories out there, and there are better more political
movies out there as well. This one doesn’t mix the elements
all that effectively. However, it could be worse. As it stands,
aside from the romantic subplot turned plot, the motion picture
is just okay.
respond to jon@filmbrats.com
|