The Lives
of Others (***1/2)
review by Jon
Waterman
Hauptmann Gerd Wiesler is a worker for the government’s
intelligence program. He’s since retired from the surveillance
unit in order to teach young upstarts how to effectively spy
and interrogate enemies of the Socialist state. After watching
a play by one of the countries most promising and party loyal
playwrights, Wiesler becomes suspicious. He asks to go back
to his roots and monitor Mr. Georg Dreyman and his well-known
actress girlfriend Christa-Maria Sieland. He sets out to prove
that no one is clean and that this man is a threat to East
Germany. Once he begins his mission, however, he finds himself
questioning what loyalty really means.
Now, since I was a kid growing up in America during the 80s
before the Berlin Wall fell (when this movie is set), it’s
impossible for me to attest to the true emotional impact and
resonance of the film would have on older generations. I can
only assume it’s quite strong, however, because even
a younger person like me was able to comprehend and appreciate
the weight of the characters’ actions and the tense mood
sprawled forth on the screen.
Writer/director Florian Henckel von Donnersmarck (in his feature
debut) beautifully and masterfully composes scenes that manage
to simultaneously convey optimism and despair, triumph and
defeat, or duty and honor. It’s this constant dichotomy
that makes the film so effective. You never know which side
will win out. It’s not just a matter of good versus evil,
or government versus opposing individual; we’re also
watching the struggle between man versus himself. Every main
character wrestles with their own perceptions of right and
wrong and fight to internally rationalize the decisions they
ultimately make (even if the actions they take are on the moral
high ground).
The only real downside of the picture is that it reminded
me too much of “The Conversation.” Both movies
deal with similar subject matter in a somewhat similar way,
although the outcomes and resolutions are vastly different.
The ending of this movie couldn’t be a bigger departure
and I’m very grateful for that not because it’s
better (because it isn’t) but because it helps the film
to finally form its own identity. I think the lack of a real
strong social commentary is a huge plus. Just simply let the
historical fears and ramifications speak for themselves.
It all works together wonderfully. The great acting, the smart,
tight emotionally loaded, yet subdued script and the exquisitely
dank and dismal cinematography form a movie that is fascinating
and satisfying from start to finish. You may not want to start
spying on people after its done, but you may want to sneak
another peek at this one.
respond to jon@filmbrats.com
|