Kissing
on the Mouth (***1/2)
review by Jon
Waterman
To describe this movie with a simple summary would be destructive,
but I’m going to do it anyway because that’s what
I almost always do. Ellen had sex with her ex-boyfriend. This
potentially small event quickly becomes escalated as she tells
her blabbermouth friend Laura who proceeds to tell Patrick.
Ellen meanwhile tries to get a handle on the whole situation
from all angles and futilely attempts to sever the “relationship” with
ex, Chris.
So, that’s that. What the movie really captures is how
a great number of post-collegiate twenty-somethings live. They’re
at the brink or currently within the quarter-life crisis stage
that’s increasingly becoming more common in today’s
youth. The struggle for identity, acceptance, meaning and truth
all are incredibly important. The last part of that equation, “truth,” is
a very touchy subject in the movie and is dealt with in a surprisingly
realistic way. Those that seek it are the ones unwilling to
speak it. This creates a lot of unnecessary tension within
the scenes. I don’t mean unnecessary in that they shouldn’t
be in the film (because the confrontational moments are some
of the most compelling), but rather in that the characters
are so frustratingly stubborn in their convictions and so caught
in their little games and social masks to get to the point.
The conversations are extremely believable, honest portrayals
of everyday interactions. You won’t find another movie
that does it this well.
The realistic approach carries over to the rest of the very
small-scale production. This is about as cinema verite as you
can get in a fiction film. The glue of the movie is the real
interviews conducted with various people of the same generation.
They offer the most insight and truth. That’s great,
because one of the main criticisms I have about the movie is
that I’d like to see more real emotions conveyed to us
from the characters. When Patrick masturbates in the shower,
what does he think afterwards? Is there a sense of secret disappointment
or shame or is there relief in releasing frustrations and fulfilling
fantasies? The characters hide. However, what the filmmakers
(who are also the cast) Joe Swanberg (Patrick), Kris Williams
(Laura), Kate Winterich (Ellen) and Kevin Pittman (Chris) don’t
show us through facial expressions is made up for in showing
us close-ups of how body language can be an effective tool
to discovering someone’s true feelings and current moods.
The running theme of bare feet speaks depths of the nakedness
and vulnerability that the characters, especially Ellen, possess.
And nakedness is a good word to use here. One of the unique
aspects of the film is its lack of inhibitions when showing
the sexuality of this generation. To some extent, this could
be considered a fault or in your face over indulgence. But
when you realize that the majority of today’s cinema
skirts around nearly everything this movie places front and
center in an attempt to bring true life to the screen, it becomes
less a gimmick and more of a manifesto. Even so, there are
going to be a lot of images here that will disturb people,
but if you’re of the right mindset it’s incredibly
easy to get used to these images and take them as part of the
daily lives presented (just as they should be).
I can’t really say the movie is perfect. In fact there
is one sequence that I found a little gimmicky. When Patrick
is calling his work on the phone, the film cuts away every
time he speaks, going to various shots of him in the city assumedly
going to work. When he’s not talking, we see him lying
in the bed close-mouthed on the phone. It doesn’t fit
very well with the rest of the narrative and gives off the
appearance of being there because it’s “cool.” Another
complaint is something of a necessary evil. The relationships
in the film are extremely ambiguous. I understand that’s
part of what our generation goes through sometimes, but as
an audience trying to grasp what’s going on with these
people we’ve never seen before, it can make things confusing
and take us out of it. It would be better to establish the
relationships and then deal with the emotional backlash and
hidden feelings that comes along with that so we don’t
have to pull away from the narrative and figure things out.
This movie is about completely avoiding conventions. That’s
what makes it so interesting to watch. There aren’t the
normal events/conflicts foiling the progress of the main character.
There are no good guys and bad guys. It shows you a side of
life virtually unseen (or in some cases probably never before
seen) in cinema. But it’s not for everybody. This movie
is for people of our generation. It shows how people in their
early to mid-twenties deal with their issues. The characters
and especially the interviews talk about all of our doubts
and fears as we still attempt to discover what we want to do
when we grow up. They give great examples of how to get so
much pleasure out of the simplest things. The film isn’t
great in that you can deconstruct the meaning of its individual
shots. Instead, it’s great because it resonates with
you. You’ll remember it well after you’ve left
the theater for all the right reasons. This movie gives validation
to so many people out there who just might think they’re
alone.
Note: I am friends with three of the filmmakers/stars. In
fact it was Joe who started this very site you’re reading
and brought me in on the ground floor. I mention this in the
interest of full disclosure, but I still stand by all the above
comments. If his film sucked, I would have stated so, or probably
just ignored reviewing it for the site. I don’t get paid
for my work here, so I have nothing to really gain by inflating
a score or his ego. The filmmaker’s best critics are
his/her friends, so my judgments on the movie are sincere and
meant with the best of intentions.
respond to jon@filmbrats.com
|