In The
Heat of the Night (****)
review by Jon
Waterman
When the man who planned to build a giant factory turns up
murdered in the streets, the police of Sparta, Mississippi
are up in arms. They bring in Virgil Tibbs, who was in the
small southern town visiting his mother, assuming he committed
the crime simply because he’s black. Police Chief Bill
Gillespie discovers that Tibbs is a homicide detective up in
Philadelphia. Now the two are stuck together, because Mr. Tibbs
is assigned to help solve this murder case that the locals
are so quick to close.
The key to the film lies in the relationship between the two
top cops. Everything follows their line of progression. As
their relationship moves from Tibbs and Gillespie to Virgil
and Bill, so do the atmosphere and the cinematography. Surprisingly,
as the two become more accustomed to one another, the tension
within the film increases. For one, the murder puzzle gets
more complex and closer to fruition. Also, the overtly racist
town gets more and more anxious for this hot shot black detective
to git – and if’n he don’, well, then they’s
about to fix that thar problem theyselves. Tibbs has no real
intention on leaving until the job gets done, however, because
his pride is on the line.
Screenwriter Stirling Silliphant (who also worked on the television
series “Perry Mason”) adapts John Ball’s
novel brilliantly. Not only is the murder mystery interesting,
it’d probably be good enough to stand the movie up on
its own without the help of the intense characterization. There
are plenty of unforeseen events and turns to keep you guessing
until the end if you wanted. However, you may be too distracted
by the inner workings of the characters. This screenplay is
very sharp and couldn’t be executed better. It shows
a side of bigotry not often seen: that intolerance does not
always equal ignorance. The film is a battle of two egos. Neither
lead is completely good, or inherently bad. The culture clash
that they experience forces them to revaluate their thinking
and sparks a lot of heated exchanges. This is all punctuated
by the outstanding acting by Sidney Poitier (Tibbs) and Rod
Steiger (Gillespie). Poitier at times seems pretty uncomfortable
on screen, which I’d like to attribute to as part of
his role rather than an acting misstep. Either way, he doesn’t
quite own the part the way Steiger does. Rod shows incredible
range and depth full of emotions that get turned on like a
light switch. It all just flows out in one of the most incredibly
natural performances I’ve seen.
The cinematography by Haskell Wexler (“Who’s Afraid
of Virginia Woolf?”) is nothing short of genius. Immediately
in the film, you can see the sharp contrast (read conflict)
conveyed in the visuals with harsh rim lights providing the
brightest spots on the screen. As the movie progresses, this
distinguishable difference between light and dark lessens and
we get a more neutral and natural look. The looks and the feels
of the scenes vary widely, depending on what’s being
depicted. The frantic chase scene with handheld running camerawork
smoothly cuts together with the lingering scenes at the station.
This is also a credit to editor Hal Ashby who’s impeccable
pacing proves that a deathly slow sequence can be not only
watchable, but also fascinating.
There are a couple of musical missteps in the form of inappropriate
cues and out of place songs, but otherwise the film is near
perfect. Director Norman Jewison has assembled a poignant,
thought-provoking piece of art that warrants not only watching
but analyzing and studying.
respond to jon@filmbrats.com
|