www.filmbrats.com

hotline
reviews
shorts
interviews
home

Please select a letter from the list below to see the reviews.

a / b / c / d / e / f / g / h / i / j / k / l / m / n / o / p / q / r / s / t / u / v / w / x / y / z


Behind The Screens

by Jon Waterman
Volume 1, Issue 2
Volume 1, Issue 1
Special Features
D-VHS
Digital Projectction vs. 35mm
Multiple DVD Releases

FILMBRATS - REVIEWS

Howl's Moving Castle (***)
review by Jon Waterman

Sophie is a young hat maker who keeps to herself and does what she’s told. Or, at least she was. That all changes when she runs into a suave magician, and later, a witch. The witch curses Sophie by turning her into a stocky, ugly old woman overnight. Forced to give up the life she knew and to hopefully find a cure, she goes in search of the wizard Howl. After stumbling on his roaming palace, she befriends the residents of his castle and quickly becomes a vital part of a team determined to defeat the forces of evil and stop a burgeoning war.

This is the latest effort from Japanese animation master writer/director Hayao Miyazaki. Like his other films, this one deals with a largely fantasy based scenario. There’s usually a lot of creativity and freshness to be found in the plots and storylines, however this film doesn’t exhibit the same behavior. Based on the novel by Diana Wynne Jones, the film just exudes this feeling of “seen it all before.” After having previously viewed “Princess Mononoke” and “Spirited Away,” the majority of the characters from “Howl’s” could easily blend into the other stories. Despite the similarities in character design, the movies all deal with very similar subject matter in magic, the appearance of roaming ominous black blobs, breaking curses and so on. There are also a couple parallels to “The Wizard of Oz,” including a scarecrow, a character called the Witch of the Waste, talking flames, and doors that open into magical new locations. If you’ve seen either of Miyazaki’s two other most recent films, there won’t be much left here to blow you away.

Even the animation isn’t particularly stunning. Computers are used too often to create the moving backgrounds and other typically painstakingly difficult drawings. Although they are in the same style, the background and foreground elements don’t integrate well enough. To make things worse, maybe it was the print, or something was wrong with the shutter on the projector in the theatre, but the traditional animation looked like it was jittery. The hand-drawn stuff appeared to be moving at a different frame rate than the rest. The computer work moved fluidly enough, but the main action staggered and looked slowed down a bit.

To its credit, the movie is kind of funny. It gets to be more so as the film goes on. There’s a surprisingly long sequence where Sophie and the Witch have to climb a “Rocky”-esque staircase, which made me crack up if only for the fact that they stretched it out so much. Billy Crystal as Calcifer, the castle’s fire and driving force, doesn’t really provide much of the “comic relief.” I think the Japanese voice actor would probably be better. But despite the similarities and the predictability, “Howl’s Moving Castle” does accomplish what it sets out to do. The characters are easy to like (perhaps because of the familiarity), and the story hits all the right spots at the right times. Children should eat this up, and so might those adults unfamiliar with the director’s history. Major fans of Miyazaki may be disappointed in this seemingly lackluster outing, but he has set the bar for himself extremely high.

respond to jon@filmbrats.com