www.filmbrats.com

hotline
reviews
shorts
interviews
home

Please select a letter from the list below to see the reviews.

a / b / c / d / e / f / g / h / i / j / k / l / m / n / o / p / q / r / s / t / u / v / w / x / y / z


Behind The Screens

by Jon Waterman
Volume 1, Issue 2
Volume 1, Issue 1
Special Features
D-VHS
Digital Projectction vs. 35mm
Multiple DVD Releases

FILMBRATS - REVIEWS

Control Room (***)
review by Jon Waterman

“Control Room” tells the story of Al Jazeera, the Arabian satellite news network. It chronicles the war between the United States and Iraq, from beginning to shortly after the take down of the Saddam statue, from their perspective. If follows the newsroom workers and journalists in their effort to provide a non-mainstream view of the world’s events.

Sure, the film is about Al Jazeera, because the central cast of participants comes from that network. However, it’s more accurately a commentary on news media in general. The channel has been harshly criticized in the United States for being overly biased and manipulative. The film shows how the American media circuit perpetuates this on the other end of the spectrum. The Al Jazeera reporters ask the hard questions and we hear the dizzying amount of spin put into the answer. The movie does a good job of not only showing the skepticism in the US Government and their responses, but also explaining why they are skeptical. Key subject Hassan Ibrahim is very eloquent and outspoken, while being honest and for the most part objective.

We aren’t just exposed to the Al Jazeera network. We see shots of reporters from the States and how they handle similar issues. It gives the audience a great look at the varying tactics and focus points that various media outlets use. The bias of Al Jazeera doesn’t really show its face here, but that doesn’t mean there isn’t one. The movie does a good job of showing how anyone is biased and how no group can escape subjectivity – including the movie itself. It does an especially good job of pointing out certain hypocrisies in the government officials’ sound bites.

It also uses on US spokesman to further explain the multi-faceted situation presented. Through his interviews (both with the filmmakers and the various news outlets), Josh Rushing promotes understanding and thoughtfulness. His personal viewpoints on the war and coverage of it change. He works as a guide to the complexity of it all.

The movie is effective in covering and criticizing media and exposing its flaws, but ultimately doesn’t offer much of anything new to the table. The concept and perception of propagandizing news isn’t unusual and in fact seems to be relatively widely accepted. If anything, it puts a good face on the Al Jazeera people and puts them in a positive light. Hopefully, it’ll act as a catalyst for discussion and for acceptance and respect of others, even if their viewpoints differ.

respond to jon@filmbrats.com