Closer (***1/2)
review by Jon
Waterman
Dan sees Alice get hit by a car. He sees that she makes it
to the hospital and back okay. They fall in love. He writes
a book about her. He’s photographed for the book by Anna.
He falls in love with her. Anna falls in love with Larry. Larry
was the subject of a practical joke that leads him to her.
Larry falls in love with Anna. The resulting love square complicates
their lives and everything gets a bit too personal. It becomes
hard to distinguish the truth from the lies and even harder
to discern who can be trusted and what actions will be taken
next.
Patrick Marber wrote the screenplay based off of his own stage
play. The dialogue contained within is some of the most compelling
to hear delivered. It’s how you wish you could talk.
The flow and the creativity and the back and forth works very
naturally on the screen, but you’d be hard pressed to
find people that actually talk in this manner on a regular
basis. There aren’t awkward pauses and everyone knows
exactly what to say at just the right moment. It’s flawless,
which makes it imperfect and unreal. But it’s still very
interesting to watch, and I admire the style.
The most interesting thing about the movie is that the action
happens off camera. The film spans nearly 5 years of their
lives. The only way you know time has passed is that they make
reference to it while talking to each other. You aren’t
left in the dark about the time changes for very long at all.
The situation is not treated like a mystery. However, all the
lying, cheating and deceit happens during the unseen transitions.
As a result, you never fully know who’s being honest
in a particular situation. Yet, I still tended to take everyone
at his or her word for whatever reason. The film seemed brutally
honest, even though there was always a chance that the entire
thing was a lie.
With the good comes the bad. Okay, not bad, but kinda lame.
The ending got really trite really fast. It began to lose me
with the way it attempted to revisit memories and themes and
everything that goes along with such things. It seemed hokey
and too typically storybook. However, leave it to director
Mike Nichols to end it on a redeeming note. It’s no coincidence
most of his movies are critically acclaimed. There’s
just something about the very last shot of the movie that wraps
it all up for me. The whole timeframe of the movie makes much
more sense based on this one simple shot.
While I don’t think the film is mind-blowingly original
or innovative, it still works. The performances are great.
The script works in an unusually poetic way. The film simply
resonates.
respond to jon@filmbrats.com
|