Brokeback
Mountain (***)
review by Jon
Waterman
Two young cowboys are desperately looking for work to sustain
them through the summer. Jack and Ennis both get roped into
watching a herd of sheep up in Wyoming’s Brokeback Mountain.
Their duties will technically be illegal, but it’ll put
food on their plates and all they have to do is sleep in a
tent and shoot at any predatory creatures that might wander
by. The new duo head off and end up learning a lot about each
other. They become quick, close friends. Then one rainy night,
instead of heading back up to his camp site at the top of the
mountain, Jack stays at base with Ennis. It’s then they
discover just how deep their bond has become. How can life
ever truly be the same after that fateful summer? Or do they
even want it to be?
I knew director Ang Lee still had the ability to make good
movies left in him, and this one is a diamond in the rough.
Of course that means the film still needs a bit of polishing.
For instance, the main narrative thread of the love story between
Ennis and Jack had me scratching my head. It seemed to move
too quickly in the beginning because every shot of them made
it seem like they were either longing for a distant lover (if
they were on different parts of the mountain looking towards
where the other would be) or undressing the other with their
eyes (if they were in the same physical space). But despite
those glances, the physical relationship seemed too unnatural
and forced. I think the relationship would have been more effective
in the beginning had the scenes been rearranged. For instance,
Ennis punches Jack out right before they are to leave the mountain.
Had he done this prior to their lovemaking, perhaps the resistance
in the tent would be a little more believable and that fight
would have made more sense. Ennis gives in and then he gets
pissed when Jack makes a pass? I don’t get it.
But, once we’re off the mountain and the two go back
to their everyday lives, the relationships between all the
characters work wonderfully and I couldn’t imagine a
more well-constructed narrative thread. I could imagine a quicker
pace, however. I know the film covers a span of twenty plus
years and takes place in the country where time moves slower,
but it doesn’t need to drag. It’d also be nice
if they made it easier to tell that the two were aging. Adding
sideburns and/or mustaches isn’t exactly cutting it.
While you’re waiting for something to happen (the gay
cowboys do not eat pudding), you can marvel at the incredible
cinematography. Rodrigo Prieto shoots gorgeous, sweeping landscapes
that capture the desolate countryside as well as the young
men’s equally empty lives. The truly amazing shots seem
to all come near the beginning, but the entire film is solid
and doesn’t resort to using different styles to reflect
the changing decades. The acting is equally on point, and I
would only really find fault with Jake Gyllenhaal (Jack) as
he tends to ham it up a tad. But, as I tend to find the most
joy in the smaller roles, my favorite performance came from
Randy Quaid as the ominous boss.
This film grabs you right from the start, especially from
the visual side. The grip isn’t always as tight as it
needs to be, but there should be no problem keeping your attention
fixed on the screen, even through the dull parts. If your beliefs
are such that you think homosexuality is wrong, then I doubt
this film is for you. I seriously doubt it’ll change
a lot of minds. But if the subject matter doesn’t bother
you, it’s worth a trip.
respond to jon@filmbrats.com
|