Adam
and Eve (Still) (**1/2)
review by Jon
Waterman
That famous story goes that Adam and Eve were banished from
the Garden of Eden after eating the forbidden fruit from the
Tree of Knowledge. This film supposes that they stole from
the Tree of Life as well and the two are now immortal. They
are destined to live forever, watching the world change around
them. Their boredom starts to overtake them and they begin
toying with mortal lives just to pass the time. However, more
than anything, they’re looking for a way to die, a way
to escape this unspeakable hell called life.
This movie was pretty interesting. It’s a unique experiment
in form and substance. There is very little dialogue, especially
in the beginning. The silence is off-putting at first, but
then becomes acceptable. As soon as characters do begin to
talk (at least ten minutes in), it’s quite jarring and
a little awkward. The mix of silence and not takes some getting
used to, if it happens at all. My preference would be to avoid
all dialogue by the main characters. It’s okay if the
actual citizens speak, because they have to. I would think
that Adam and Eve would have gotten to a point within their
relationship and understanding of one another that they wouldn’t
need words. They should be beyond that. Combine these awkward
gaps with the lingering shots/sequences and the blurry nature
of time, and you get a movie that’s a little bit too
experimental to be considered an effective narrative. On the
same note, it’s also a little too narrative to be considered
an effective experimental film.
Since it’s telling the story of the first man and woman,
you might expect a little nudity. After all, they entered the
world without any clothes on, and they most likely feel most
comfortable that way still. There are many scenes that invoke
nakedness and some that include it without the proper motivation.
No matter how it comes about, it becomes nothing, just like
in “The Dreamers.”
Basically, the film takes too long to develop into anything
interesting. We quickly understand that eternal life is boring
and miserable. At least they get to stay young and fresh (unlike
in “Death Becomes Her”). I would have liked to
see God used as a character and see how he deals with these
two. It’s tough to get involved in the movie, when it
takes a half hour to form a recognizable narrative thread.
The cinematography looks fantastic. There are great, vibrant
pastel colors mixed in with the murky backdrops of the city,
which makes for an interesting landscape. The set pieces are
very detailed and even the costumes showcase the boredom they
are faced with. It’s quite creative and provides plenty
of eye candy. But this mix of experimental and narrative forms
gives director Iván Avila Dueñas an air of pretentiousness.
The movie was good, but it could have been great.
respond to jon@filmbrats.com
|