You Are Here: Blog
Back to Filmbrats

Archives

  • January 2003
  • February 2003
  • March 2003
  • April 2003
  • May 2003
  • June 2003
  • July 2003
  • August 2003
  • September 2003
  • October 2003
  • November 2003
  • December 2003
  • January 2004
  • February 2004
  • March 2004
  • April 2004
  • May 2004
  • June 2004
  • July 2004
  • August 2004
  • September 2004
  • October 2004
  • November 2004
  • December 2004
  • January 2005
  • February 2005
  • March 2005
  • April 2005
  • May 2005
  • June 2005
  • July 2005
  • August 2005
  • September 2005
  • October 2005
  • November 2005
  • December 2005
  • January 2006
  • February 2006
  • March 2006
  • Current Posts
  • © Joe Swanberg 2001-2005 all rights reserved.
    All film reviews are copyrighted by their respective authors.
    Hosted By DreamHost

    This site uses ForSite
    a product of Site9.

    Filmbrats.com is
    dedicated to
    Gregory Steven Vasich (1981 - 2004).

    Wednesday, March 29, 2006


    HUSTLE & FLOW, MR. SMITH GOES TO WASHINGTON and WHY WE FIGHT

    It's been about three weeks since my last post, so I bring you three new reviews. I should be back sooner than you might expect, because I have a couple more reviews waiting on deck with one more to go. I smell trilogy! In the meantime, please enjoy what you see below.



    Why We Fight
    Review by Jon Waterman

    ***

    During his farewell address to the American public, President Dwight D. Eisenhower warned the people of a burgeoning trend. He called it the “Military Industrial Complex.” He feared the military, in conjunction with the corporations and industries that produce its materials, was growing too powerful and too influential. Policy should be dictated by the people, the masses and not by the interests of the few. If this new machine is able to gain more political clout in the White House, the nation will be harmed in a potentially irrevocable manner.

    That was 1961. In 2006, filmmaker Eugene Jarecki (“The Trials of Henry Kissinger”) studies the current relationship between policy makers and this Military Industrial Complex. What he finds is that Eisenhower’s nightmare is true and the results could end up being worse than even he imagined. Jarecki paints an incriminating portrait of current politics in which both parties are equally guilty of falling victim to this seemingly unstoppable machine. He forms a well-researched and damning argument, especially against the George W. Bush administration while showing the subtle and not so subtle corruption that’s been taking place essentially since World War II.
    (more....)


    +++++++++


    Mr. Smith Goes to Washington
    Review by Jon Waterman

    ****

    After a senator’s untimely death, certain politicos are left in the lurch. They need to find someone who will vote for their potentially controversial bill. Their best bet lies within a naïve man by the name of Jefferson Smith. Smith is head of the Boy Rangers and his popularity amongst kids and parents is soaring. Also, his father was friends with one of the senators behind the bill, Joseph Paine. Surely this man will sit back quietly and do whatever he’s told until the next election. And it looks like that will happen until Smith introduces a bill of his own that would contradict the one Paine brought him in to pass. Mr. Smith soon finds himself in great conflict with a family friend and his own ideals.

    Who would have ever thought a filibuster could be so entertaining? You don’t have to be interested in politics to enjoy this incredible touching, funny and extremely inspirational film. The movie isn’t really about politics anyway. It deals with the simple eternal battle between good and evil. More precisely it deals with the struggle of man versus boy, both literally and figuratively. The children try to rally up support for their candidate Jefferson Smith against the stogy old politicians. Things get more intense later as parallels are drawn between Smith’s hometown and his showdown on the Senate floor.
    (more....)


    ++++++++


    Hustle & Flow
    Review by Jon Waterman

    ***

    Djay is a struggling drug dealer and pimp with one ho that he pushes to johns out of his unconditioned parked car. He talks a mean game, but his lifestyle doesn’t represent all the hype and the credit he gives himself. He feels like he’s destined to make something out of his life, but it isn’t until he makes a trade (a little weed for a small electronic keyboard) that he figures out how. Armed with inspiration and the ability to pimp (in this case, himself), he just may become the next big from rags to riches rap success story. All he needs to do is produce a record and find a way to get it played.

    Terrence Howard stars in a deserving breakthrough performance as Djay. He, like others in the cast, does a great job of creating a character you can empathize with, despite his line of work. Coming from a middle class, essentially suburban city, it’s tougher for me to imagine just how hard it really is out there for a pimp, but Howard and costars help blur the line and put a very real human face on some of the struggles and situations they face in their rundown neighborhoods. He delivers some great monologues that really make you believe in him. I’m buying what he’s selling. Although, not really because my girlfriend would kill me. And I don’t find Taryn Manning (Nola the prostitute) attractive. And I don’t have money.
    (more....)

    Sunday, March 12, 2006


    TOP & BOTTOM TEN OF 2005 is here!

    Just as I promised, my Top Ten and Bottom Ten lists are now up on filmbrats. You can find them here, or if you don't want to follow this link, go to the filmbrats reviews page and click on the link found there. I'm still in the process of seeing and reviewing other 2005 movies, which is why the list was so late to begin with. But hey, you have to cut it off sometime, right? I doubt anything I have to review would be making it to either list anyway.

    Speaking of which, the excitement never stops here at filmbrats. Not only did I post three new reviews yesterday, but also in upcoming posts, I will be reviewing Dave Chappelle's Block Party, Final Destination, Final Destination 3, Hustle & Flow, Mr. Smith Goes to Washington, Munich, Roll Bounce, Testosterone, Unknown White Male, and the new documentary Why We Fight. And I'm seeing more all the time. The site is busy, but I hope you're not too busy to come back and check it out.

    Saturday, March 11, 2006


    THE PINK PANTHER (2006 & 1963) and BUBBA HO-TEP

    Hey everyone. I'm going to keep this update short. Below you'll find three new reviews. Soon I'll have my top and bottom ten lists posted on main review page, so be on the lookout for that. I still have quite a bit to review and I'm seeing more all the time, so keep coming back. Enjoy.


    The Pink Panther (2006)
    Review by Jon Waterman

    *1/2

    During an on-field celebration at a soccer match, the world’s most famous player is murdered. Taken along with his life was the world’s most famous diamond: the Pink Panther. In order to solve the mystery, Chief Inspector Dreyfus decides to start up a prominent investigation with an incompetent nitwit at the helm. That way, he can conduct the real investigation without the criminals catching on. Dreyfus finds his nitwit in the form of France’s own Jacques Clouseau. Of course, Inspector Clouseau has no idea that he’s just a front, but that won’t stop him from trying to find the culprit and close the case.

    This is one of the loosest remakes I’ve ever seen. I can only assume it’s a rehash of the whole original series, but I can’t be sure, because at the time of this review, I’ve only seen “The Pink Panther” from 1963. But I can tell you it’s absolutely nothing like that movie. This new incarnation stars Steve Martin as Clouseau who also co-wrote it with Len Blum (“Stripes,” “Beethoven’s 2nd,” and “Private Parts”). Martin’s characterization of the Inspector is slightly less clumsy and a lot more idiotic. But at least this version attempts to tell jokes rather than just rely on physical humor and a dragging plot. Even though most of the comedy falls flat on its face more times than Clouseau, there are a couple of surprising parts.
    (more....)


    ++++++++++


    The Pink Panther (1963)
    Review by Jon Waterman

    *1/2

    A mastermind thief dubbed The Phantom is still at large, and there’s good reason to suspect he’ll attempt to strike again soon. Princess Dala is visiting a winter hot spot and will be attending some elite soirees. She’s at risk, because with her is the famous pink panther diamond, a very large, valuable stone whose only flaw is a slight bit of coloration in the shape of its namesake. These parties always act as a catalyst for The Phantom’s heists, but luckily there’s a detective on the case. The bumbling Inspector Jacques Clouseau is at your service.

    Simply put, this film is not funny. I think the Phantom stole all the jokes before they had a chance to be filmed. Contemporary audiences looking for a film that stars Peter Sellers will be surprised that they don’t find it here. Oh, he’s in the movie quite a bit, but he takes a backseat to virtually everyone else. That’s not what makes the movie bad, although seeing as how he’s the only likable character and we hardly get any worthy screen time with the Inspector doesn’t help.
    (more....)


    +++++++++


    Bubba Ho-Tep
    Review by Jon Waterman

    *1/2

    What if Elvis Presley never actually died? Perhaps he got sick of his life and traded places with an uncanny impersonator who took over. Maybe he’s actually slowly deteriorating inside a small nursing/retirement home down in Texas. Now, what if John F. Kennedy’s brain wasn’t actually missing? Perhaps the government decided to implant it into the head of a young black man. Maybe that man is now well-aged and in the same home with the king. Okay, stay with me here. What if a cursed mummy suddenly popped up? Perhaps he began feeding on the souls of the old folks residing there. Maybe the only people that can stop him are Elvis and JFK.

    What if you have a promising, extremely original concept….ahhh, forget it. Suffice it to say, the actual movie doesn’t quite live up to the same standards as the king’s sequenced jumpsuits. I think I was just expecting a different movie: one with more action, better pacing and even more quirk. The film does come off as campy weird at times, but seems to take itself a little bit too seriously, what with Elvis’ voice over narrative reflections on the subtle tragedy of growing old. Now, I know this Mr. Presley can’t gyrate his hips like he used to, but more action of some kind is in order.
    (more....)

    Powered by Blogger

    Film Sites

    Cinematical
    File Thirteen
    Film Threat
    GreenCine Daily
    IndieWire
    Mike D'Angelo
    Movie City Indie
    Reverse Shot
    Senses of Cinema

    Previous Posts

  • HUSTLE & FLOW, MR. SMITH GOES TO WASHINGTON and WHY WE FIGHT
  • TOP & BOTTOM TEN OF 2005 is here!
  • THE PINK PANTHER (2006 & 1963) and BUBBA HO-TEP
  • SAW, SAW II, EQUILIBRIUM and HOSTEL
  • Four new reviews including DOOM
  • THE PRODUCERS (2005 & 1968)
  • The work of Experimental Filmmaker MARK O'CONNELL
  • All three versions of KING KONG
  • BROKEBACK MOUNTAIN and BROKEN
  • Five New Reviews including HARRY POTTER AND THE GOBLET OF FIRE