You Are Here: Blog
Back to Filmbrats

Archives

  • January 2003
  • February 2003
  • March 2003
  • April 2003
  • May 2003
  • June 2003
  • July 2003
  • August 2003
  • September 2003
  • October 2003
  • November 2003
  • December 2003
  • January 2004
  • February 2004
  • March 2004
  • April 2004
  • May 2004
  • June 2004
  • July 2004
  • August 2004
  • September 2004
  • October 2004
  • November 2004
  • December 2004
  • January 2005
  • February 2005
  • March 2005
  • April 2005
  • © Joe Swanberg 2001-2005 all rights reserved.
    All film reviews are copyrighted by their respective authors.
    Hosted By DreamHost

    This site uses ForSite
    a product of Site9.

    Filmbrats.com is
    dedicated to
    Gregory Steven Vasich (1981 - 2004).

    Friday, March 28, 2003


    Just Married
    *

    Review by Jon Waterman

    Sarah and Tom have had a perfect relationship so far. After being together for a little less than a year, they decide that nothing can end that happiness and, so, get married. They’re off to Europe for their honeymoon and, uh oh, mishap after mishap ensues. What shall come of this marriage if the zany adventures don’t come to an end?

    The story is told as a flashback. Tom sits at his radio job as a traffic reporter (a detail completely irrelevant to understanding anything about him) and remembers the horrible events that took place prior to his return. The movie works just as well, if not better if told as a straight narrative. The beginning of the picture lets us know that the two are on the rocks. If that realization is brought about nearer the end of the film, we, as an audience may care more. Instead we are sitting there waiting for this falling out to occur.

    I’m really beginning to question the appeal of goofball, prat fall comedies such as this one. As a general rule, physical comedy is only funny when there is an element of surprise. This particular script, written by Sam Harper (“Rookie of the Year”), tends to set up the joke for about a minute or two with verbal and visual clues, thus stripping the joke of any actual effect. Had all of this been cut out, the film would be about a half hour shorter, and only slightly funnier. Surprisingly, I don’t really care about the unbelievability of the situations. I’ll let it all slide based on the concept of “suspension of disbelief” and the fact that I’m talking about a nonsense comedy.

    Everything about this film could be called sub-par. Shawn Levy’s (“Big Fat Liar”) proves that pacing and coaching actors are not his strong suit. I’ve mentioned the script. Ashton Kutcher (Tom) feels that the only way to get a joke out is to yell it at the top of his lungs, which is something he learned from Adam Sandler and then butchered. Brittany Murphy (Sarah) has the goofy grin thing going but comedic timing isn’t a strong suit for her either. I felt the chemistry between the two characters worked well, even if I didn’t care about them at all.

    Perhaps I was pulled out of it, because the commercial shows all the jokes. However, I didn’t laugh at the commercial, either. Not only that, but if the thirty second spot gives away the “best” parts, then how good can the movie be to begin with?

    Powered by Blogger

    Film Sites

    Cinematical
    File Thirteen
    Film Threat
    GreenCine Daily
    IndieWire
    Mike D'Angelo
    Movie City Indie
    Reverse Shot
    Senses of Cinema

    Previous Posts

  • The Lion King **** Review by Jon Waterman O...
  • first of all I have to say that I just watched the...
  • I was just thinking today, that I am a big fan of ...
  • Hey all, The Big Muddy Film Festival kicks off ...
  • Attention all you shoppers out there; two great DV...
  • Talk to Her ***1/2 Where do I begin? Well let’s...
  • David Gordon Green, the director of George Washing...
  • Who's ready for my top ten list? Here they are ...
  • The Oscar nominations have been announced, and I t...
  • Go see Chicago. It's great.